What the hell KAHN?

This... is... soooooo... FAIL. Delonte will be dumped to save three mil. Telfair clearly gets paid less than Sessions and Hollins.

How much salary does he need to dump? At what point does this stop?

Is he freeing up cap space for a big name free agent to sign with us before the season starts? Oh wait...

www.twolvesblog.com/201007273076/minneso...for-westtelfair.html

For the record, I've very glad we're dumping Hollins. He sucks for sure.

However, I'm not happy we're just giving away Sessions for two guys we will cut.

Of all our current PG's, if it was up to me I'd keep/start Sessions. He's young and legit (if not forced to solely run the idiotic Triangle.)

Oh man John Hollinger is ripping us on Twitter:


If they waive West, T'wolves just traded last year's two free agent signings for a No. 3 point guard. Remind me again what the plan is here?
about 1 hour ago via web


70 replies in half an hour for a T'wolves Tweet on a Monday night in late July. Who knew Kahn could move the needle like this? #KAHHHHHHN!!!
26 minutes ago via web


On a related note, my offseason losers column runs tomorrow. Already filed before this trade. Let's just say I won't need to add any teams.
25 minutes ago via web


http://twitter.com/johnhollinger

Here's the ESPN link of the trade:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5412223

College Wolf wrote:


Wow...that is harsh. Kahn cannot do anything without being rip.

I really do hope Kahn gets the last laugh.

I am disappointed in this because Sessions and Hollins were Kahn's guys.

Hollins, well he just sucked donkey nuts and was a terrible signing.

Sessions on the other hand, was never given a legit chance, and now he's trading him less than a year later because the contract was bad?

What's Kahn's excuse for this? He signed these guys, not McHale.

I fear Kahn has NO IDEA what he's doing when it comes to judging talent...

Telfair rules. I prefer him to Sessions.

pants wrote:


I liked Telfair too when he was here, but Sessions is a better PG.

College Wolf wrote:


Sessions might be a bit better but I'd still rather have Bassy. We are talking backup PG here after all.

Why oh why didn't we give 3 years/$12M to Shaun Livingston.

pants wrote:


Not white. Not foreign. Didn't play at Syracuse. Not a great smile.

College Wolf wrote:



sighs gives bonk pants n cw a drink......

its sad but true, woulda adored to have Shaun play here...

Wow, we played this one about as bad as we possibly could. We invested a year in Sessions and got nothing in return. And we got nothing in return because we gave him a career low number of minutes...and because our second unit was aaaawwfullll.

Who will watch this team? Die hard fans are fed up with these ridiculous moves and no casual fan will watch a team this bad.

I don't get why people are mad at this deal. This deal don't even matter. What are we going to get for Sessions? Batum? probably not. We had an access at PG and he needed to be move and now he got moved. Plus, it's not like we're losing some great PG either, no matter where he goes, he's going to be a back up.

9Deuce wrote:



This is why I'm mad. See above:



Kahn just doesn't know what he's doing when it comes to judging talent. His drafts have not been good. Hollins and Sessions were definitely HIS guys.

Now he has to make a middling trade to dump HIS guys after 1 season? And we lose a pick because of it? I'm not genius, but I tried to tell everyone that the Hollins signing was terrible last year after it went down. Damn, pay me $500K to run this team, and it still saves Taylor money. I honestly don't think I could do worse than Kahn. At least my drafts would have kicked ass the past 5 years.

well..


sessions is a better point.. he's proven he could play huge minutes and will be good back up to mo wills...

telly can still play tho and tri-off.. i think it fits him good he's a good disher and has a nice ankle breaking moves

i will say for money reasons it make sense ..but then its then makes me scratch my head...who do we need the money for???

but least we arent paying hollins to sit in a suit.. and sessions possible starting money when he would not be the starter and if they are still after rubio we woulda had 4pgs with starting contracts...

so i think it makes sense in some ways


i really donno what to think cuz i just got done watchin inception so im like trippin right now n just found out bout this trade

i do like telly tho