Check it out:

sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/p...n.love.qa/index.html

College Wolf wrote:


That is hilarious. It is actually surprising to me that this is so. As a developer myself I love to picture how this came to be. My guess is at one time they programmed the backup C is the longsnapper and they were lazy and didn't get around to changing it. So the logic is better to ignore the long snappers than have them in the game and have people notice that they weren't doing the long snap.

Umm yeah I responded to the Vikings/Madden thing in the wrong thread. Carry on. Nothing to see here.

pants wrote:



Here's what he was talking about everyone:

www.twolvesblog.com/forum/nfl-forum/5225...-in-madden-2011.html


And yes, I find it hilarious too. That's a good theory as to what happened, and really, why would they go back and spend time/money to fix it?

What I really love are the responses from the Vikings players HAHAHA!