roundhouse wrote:
The general consensus was that it was a 4 player draft (Wall, Turner, Favors, Cousins) and Kahn basically announced to the entire NBA a week before the draft that he was going to take Wes. Major FUBAR. I don't know that many people who actually wanted Cousins (lots of talk about trading up for Turner or Favors), but we could have easily drafted him and taken the best offer from SAC, GS, or DET who were all hot after him and still ended up with Wes. Fail.
Can't really disagree with you on this, but I will say (and ridiculous as this sounds now, it still holds true) that after Wall (sure thing) and Turner (almost a sure thing), there was a big gap. You had the super young guy with the attitude and the athleticism but not the production (Favors), you had the super young guy with the athleticism and production but not the attitude (Cousins), and you had the older guy with the attitude, athleticism, and production (Wes).
Looking back it would be hard to have as poor a projection for a player with the same success at college and the outside scoring as well as being a high flyer. Wes at Syracuse was categorically more productive, more consistent, and a better and more versatile college player than Harrison Barnes has been this year. The biggest difference is age, so maybe there's more to that than I give credit.
You are right about all of the strategy and posturing failures of Kahn. If I remember right, Sacto threatened to take and keep Wes at #5 and Kahn tipped his hand and ended up panicking because he was afraid of getting stuck with Cousins. Given the fragile state of our team at that point, I can't totally disagree with that logic except that in retrospect we almost certainly could have got back great value from someone for Cousins. Still, would you have forgiven Kahn if Cousins ran Love out of town, knowing what we know now?
Food for thought anyway. I don't disagree with your retrospective, I just think that at the time Wes was not as unappealing as he is now.