WallyWorld wrote:
daddyfatsax wrote:
WallyWorld wrote:
Developing him as a 3 is a fool's errand. Keeping him as a backup 4 is a fool's errand.
I just don't understand the plan with him. While I presently was not in favor if trading him for Batum, I think down the line it will be viewed as an opportunity missed.
You/we know for sure they refused to put D-Charge on the table?
No one knows for sure. I trust Doogie Wolfson and his sources who say they didn't. Portland says they did. Kahn ovevalues guys he acquired.
What I do know is if Portland turned down D Will and a 1st round pick for Batum they are bigger idiots than Kahn. Batum was never worth $12 million per year. My current defense mechanism: this contract was a bullet dodged. We should now have little difficulty keeping Pekovic long term (more important than Batum) while still have room to fart around the rest of the summer and improve the SF position.
It sounds like Portland tried to include him and the Wolves said, "sure, we'll part with him if you take on our bad contracts and also we won't give you any firsts in that case." And Portland balked.
Batum is good. Whatever, if he's a solid 2 way player then $11.5M is not tons for us since he would make 4 of 5 starters that are "plus" guys. Instead we settle on two average starters and three plus guys.
If we overpay for a 3rd big man, it really needs to be a shot blocker.
Also- and I am not saying this will happen, but I am just pointing this out- the crazy thing about Wes Johnson's skill level is that if he managed to do like 1 or 2 things better (i.e. play more physical/nasty or attack the basket more, or both) he could be a really solid player. He's just so athletic and has a really good shot. The reason his percentages are awful is because he hamstrings himself into never doing anything besides shooting outside jumpers, which always results in bad shooting percentages.
If he got to the rim 3-4 times a game, he could easily be a 16-20 ppg guy. If he were meaner, he could be a lockdown defender. The tools are there. Just pointing out how tenuous the line between good and awful can be at the highest levels.