I would guess this would be a good group of people to discuss the positives and negatives of both games. Especially how I have seen threads for both games, mainly people being the greatest gm's of all time and molesting other teams for there good players. I have NBA live and i was interested in how the 2k games is.

2k is way better.

How are peoples associations???

Current Wolves lineup of mine (remember you can edit the prospects which is sweet, I changed the top 10 of this years draft...yes that means we can all sign Pekovic in 2010 for 10 mil per season!)

PG: Foye, Blake
SG: Harden, Ben Gordon
SF: Miller, Carney
PF: Al, Love, Madsen, Scalabrine (novely signings)
C: Thabeet, Marc Gasol

WallyWorld wrote:
So what you make the players in next years draft since they cant put college players real names in video games tell they turn pro. I just have always had problems with 2k's quality but this may be different. There baseball games should not even be allowed to be sold. I saw a video of this game and the main difference I see is the crowd looks alot better in the 2k game.

All 2k games suck way harder than EA...except NBA2k series.

NBA2k is 1000000000000000000000 times better than NBAlive.

I can't stress this enough.

Oh and also the EA and 2k NHL games are both really good games, it just depends on preference.

roundhouse wrote:
What does the NBA2K games have that is so good? Just wondering I do know that the game visuals look a lot better.

I take back what I said about the visuals. Just rented 2K and I own nba live. The two arent even close NBA live is way better in all ways. The only knock on the ea game is every once in awhile there will be a play that could never happen. But 2k half assed that game just like they do everyother game they make.