College Wolf wrote:
That's some good reading there. I really like that guy's work.
Those ideas certainly seem feasible, and reasonable, to me. There's no way the owners will get away with what they want to do in their entirety, and the players have already said they are willing to make concessions.
If they want to avoid a lockout enough, it should be able to get done. Problem is it sounds like the owners really truly WANT a lockout.

Well we are in the typical part of the negotiation where both sides ask for 300% more than they actually hope to get. Heaven forbid a union negotiations just start with a reasonable contract (looking at both sides).
The NBA thrives on personalities. This isn't really the case with the NFL. You can't have a system that doesn't reward maintaining continuity.
Everyone in pro sports is very very slowly wrapping their heads around the new world where teams don't triple in value in 10 years. They stay constant. The business is mature. I love that guys note about how every year of the contract must be the same. That way shitty GM's can't leverage the future.