DeROK wrote:Cricket is actually pretty cool. I was doing an ER shift with an Indian doctor who was watching it over the internet. He taught me all about it.
This was a few months ago, so it may not be 100% accurate. Correct me if i'm wrong AusWolf...
It's very similar to baseball in many ways, but each team only gets up once. Each team gets a set amount of turns up to bat and you either play through until you've used up all those turns, or you get 10 outs. It's actually pretty hard to get people out, unlike baseball. Whoever scored the most runs wins.
It can be either extremely entertaining if you've got a close match, or mind numbingly boring if it's a blowout. If the first team gets up and rocks the joint, then you sit through 2 hours of the other team's turn up watching futility. Since there's so many plate appearances, a trend sort of begins to appear and you can figure out if they're on pace to make it close or not.
It might be, well they've got 30 tries left and they're down 40, so they need 1.3 runs per try and they're going at a 1.2 runs per try pace, so this could be close.
Or they could have 30 tries and be down 60 and they need 2 runs per try and they're going at a 1.2 runs per try pace, so this thing is practically over. But then you still have to sit through all the at bats.
make sense?
That's a pretty good run at it. Cricket terminology is slightly different. We would tend to talk about balls and overs (6 balls to an over). Batsmen play an innings - some can last for a couple of days. Plenty of ways to be dismissed - in fact one Indian batsman playing Australia last week was dismissed without facing a ball.
Can matches be boring? Sometimes. But the great ones are so great they are folklore, just like baseball.
Some are just odd such as the Timeless Test between South Africa and England in the '30's which lasted for 13 days (they played for a result), but only ended when the boat due to take the English home had to leave!