WallyWorld wrote:
Yes yes and yes
Im guessing we just end up giving the 1st, which is what I was seeing a lot on Twitter earlier tonight; in which case, in a vacuum the trade is not all that bad. BUT....it's the fact that Melo is involved in a 2nd deal. Suddenly this gets a LOT more interesting, and any solid GM would be working to pry more from NY, given that they want Melo MORE than THREE of their (quite solid, too) starters COMBINED. This gives us leverage to push. As in we should get Gallinari or Chandler and I'm not even remotely trying to be a homer. Not to borrow a Management 101 analogy but Kahn is looking at the trees and not the forest. He does this often, and thus, is horrible.
The only devils advocate remark I'll make is maybe we are overrating the Wolves being "crucial" to completing the trade. Could be.
More likely: no other team is stupid enough to help New York like that for so little in return. What a joke.
Maybe you are right about that, but I don't see any other teams lining up to take Eddy Curry off their hands for Anthony Randolph.
We actually ARE crucial to this, because only 4 teams can absorb Curry's deal without giving anything significant back. The Wolves and Sacto have the cap space. Cleveland and Toronto have their huge trade exceptions from the Bosh/LBJ trades.
So yeah, it's a disgrace we wouldn't get more in this for helping this trade finally go down.